Login:
Opta Client Care:1-855-218-0784      


Opta Newsroom

Snapshot: Fire Underwriters Survey

Snapshot: Fire Underwriters Survey
13 July 2015

Using FUS, an underwriter typed in the address of a commercial risk and instantly received a detailed fire grade. The fire grade offered a breakdown of the nearest fire hall’s ability to respond to a fire; namely, the number of fulltime fire fighters, their training programs, the type of equipment employed, and the communication systems used.

FUS also illustrated the distance of the fire hall to the risk and the time it would take to drive there. Finally, FUS offered geo-coded information about the nearest fire hydrant to the risk. With all of this information, the underwriter could see that the risk had a good level of fire protection because the nearest responding fire hall had more than thirty experienced fire fighters on hand and they used modern, quality equipment. Drive time to the risk was only two minutes and the nearest fire hydrant was only fifty metres away, so the fire fighters could quickly connect the fire hoses and would benefit from a strong water flow because of their proximity to the hydrant. The underwriter visually verified all this information using the map images provided in FUS.

After adding the fire grade score directly into her rating algorithm, the underwriter was confident about the rate she would offer the building owner and about her ability to monitor her capacity based on this rate.



Request More Info

Interested In:



  • iClarify Valuations - 2015 National Study

    The only desktop solution that lets you validate property data instantly, accurately and efficiently

  • The Power of iClarify in Rural Areas

    Find out what powers the accuracy of iClarify™ valuations in Rural Areas. Read more...

  • AutoVision

    Find out how one insurer used AutoVision to earn a 3.5:1 ROI in the first year of implementation.

  • Big Data, Analytics, and Baseball

    Predictive analytics has not been fully applied to the property side and the primary consequence has manifest to an $11 billion dollar insurance-to-value (ITV) challenge

  • iClarify Valuations: Ontario

    Ontario’s average variance is 0.67% between Contractor Estimate and iClarify™ Valuations. Find out what powers the accuracy of iClarify™ Valuations.

  • iClarify Valuations: Alberta

    Alberta’s average variance is -0.30% between Contractor Estimate and iClarify™ Valuations. Find out what powers the accuracy of iClarify™ Valuations.

  • iClarify Valuations: BC

    British Columbia’s average variance is -0.22% between Contractor Estimate and iClarify™ Valuations. Find out what powers the accuracy of iClarify™ Valuations.

  • iClarify Valuations: Quebec

    Quebec’s average variance is 1.66% between Contractor Estimate and iClarify™ Valuations. Find out what powers the accuracy of iClarify™ Valuations.

  • iClarify Valuations: Atlantic

    Atlantic Region average variance is 0.90% between Contractor Estimate and iClarify™ Valuations. Find out what powers the accuracy of iClarify™ Valuations.

  • CAA Insurance

    CAA Insurance was looking for ways to streamline their policy quoting process. Read more...

  • Savings with iClarify

    A leading Ontario insurance broker was looking for ways to streamline their renewal and quoting process. Read more...